Hey friends,

I’ve been thinking a lot about how easy it’s become to build in 2025.

You don’t need a team, funding, or even code. You just need curiosity — and the nerve to try.

It usually starts the same way. Someone opens ChatGPT late at night with a random problem — a blog post to draft, a workflow to fix, a proposal to clean up. They start experimenting.

One prompt, two prompts, ten refinements later — something clicks. A dull task becomes effortless. A problem that once felt too small to build suddenly has a solution.

Two weeks later, that same person has a waitlist and an inbox full of requests. What started as a prompt quietly evolved into a product.

This isn’t just about faster prototyping.

It’s about how AI has lowered the psychological barrier to creation — turning every curious mind into a potential builder.

For the first time in history, the creative class isn’t limited by capital, code, or connections. It’s limited only by curiosity — and the willingness to share imperfect things in public.

That’s the deeper shift most people miss when they talk about “AI innovation.”
It’s not a tech revolution. It’s a permission revolution.

In today’s edition, we’ll explore:

If you’ve ever felt that spark — the thrill of making something work for the first time — this one’s for you. 

— Naseema Perveen

Tech moves fast, but you're still playing catch-up?

That's exactly why 100K+ engineers working at Google, Meta, and Apple read The Code twice a week.

Here's what you get:

All delivered twice a week in just 2 short emails.

Join 100K+ engineers

Every major wave of technology brought efficiency.
The printing press made books faster.
The internet made communication faster.
AI makes validation faster.

Before AI, testing an idea required resources — time, money, or technical skills.
Now? A single well-written prompt can simulate a prototype, a pitch deck, a business plan, or even customer feedback.

It means the risk of trying has vanished.
And when risk disappears, what replaces it is something infinitely more powerful — permission.

People aren’t afraid to start anymore.
They’re afraid not to.

AI quietly rewired our collective mindset:

And that, more than any algorithmic leap, is the reason we’re seeing an explosion of creators, makers, and solo founders who never saw themselves as “tech people.”

AI didn’t make building easier.
It made starting possible.

In the old world, builders were rewarded for execution — for shipping polished products with precision and discipline.

In the AI world, the real winners are those who embrace exploration — curiosity, iteration, and the courage to publish before it’s perfect.

That’s the unspoken difference between today’s founders and yesterday’s:

The barrier between “thinking” and “building” used to be months.
Now, it’s one good afternoon.

That shift changes everything — not just who builds, but how we build.
We’re moving from a plan-driven world to a play-driven world.

Play, in this context, isn’t childish.
It’s how discovery happens.

Every breakthrough in AI products — from Perplexity AI’s conversational search to Notion AI’s in-line writing tools — began as an experiment, not a roadmap.
An experiment that someone decided to not stop refining.

That’s the essence of modern product-building:
You don’t start with a business model.
You start with a question you can’t stop thinking about.

Everyone says AI makes building easier.
It does — but it also makes originality harder.

When anyone can spin up a chatbot, generate a website, or clone a workflow, execution loses its edge.

In a world where everyone can build, taste becomes the differentiator.

The real moat isn’t technical anymore — it’s emotional and philosophical.
Who can understand human nuance deeply enough to design something people actually care about?

AI leveled the playing field for productivity.
Now it’s raising the bar for meaning.

You can automate tasks.
But you can’t automate taste, empathy, or judgment.

That’s why the best AI builders are less like engineers and more like psychologists.
They study what frustrates people.
They design not for efficiency, but for relief.

Because the future of AI isn’t in writing more code — it’s in writing better questions.

Every great AI product starts with curiosity.
And the ones that survive turn that curiosity into a system.

Here’s what I call the Curiosity Loop — a model used (often unknowingly) by successful AI founders:

That’s how a late-night idea becomes a market-ready product.

Curiosity → Experiment → Feedback → Refinement → Business.

Notion’s “Ask AI” button came from such loops.
So did Replit’s Ghostwriter and Jasper’s content templates.

They didn’t plan to build those products — they discovered them through curiosity.

There’s something oddly intimate about building with AI.
Because every prompt we write doesn’t just instruct the model — it reveals us.

Our thinking style.
Our clarity (or lack of it).
Our assumptions about how the world works.

When the output disappoints, it’s rarely the model’s fault. It’s ours.

AI doesn’t just generate — it reflects.
And that reflection can be deeply uncomfortable.

Many builders don’t realize they’re not just engineering systems — they’re engineering themselves.
Every iteration sharpens not just the prompt, but the person behind it.

We learn to:

That’s what makes AI prompting one of the most powerful thinking exercises of our time. It’s not just “writing better inputs.” It’s about understanding your own output as a thinker.

Here’s the hard truth: 95% of prompt-based projects fade out.

Not because they’re bad ideas — but because their creators stop evolving.

A static prompt is a fragile product.
It works once, then decays.
But a living system — one that learns, adapts, and improves through user feedback — compounds in value.

The best builders know this.
They don’t just write prompts.
They train loops.

Every user interaction becomes training data.
Every failure becomes insight.

That’s how a prompt grows into a product — through iteration, not invention.

This is why so many “AI startups” that launched in 2023 are already gone.
They built tools, not systems.
They sold novelty, not evolution.

Sustained success in AI isn’t about being early.
It’s about being endlessly curious.

Before it became a unicorn, Jasper was a spreadsheet of marketing prompts.
Its founders noticed a pattern: marketers didn’t want “AI writing.”
They wanted AI that thought like them.

So Jasper trained on copywriting principles — headlines, CTAs, tones of voice — and created templates that mirrored how humans write.

It wasn’t the AI that made Jasper valuable.
It was how closely it understood human frustration.

Their real innovation wasn’t in the prompt.
It was in empathy.

Replit didn’t try to build a coding assistant overnight.
They launched a tiny autocomplete test, collected user data, and trained it on the patterns of real developers’ code.

What made it magical wasn’t accuracy — it was familiarity.
Developers felt like the tool “understood” them.

In other words:
Replit didn’t just teach AI to code — it taught AI to mirror human intuition.

That’s the essence of all successful AI products:
They don’t just solve problems.
They reflect patterns of how people naturally work.

Perplexity didn’t invent AI search.
They just asked a better question:

“What if search answered, not listed?”

They built a conversational loop instead of a results page.
And by aligning their product with the way people actually think, they built one of the fastest-growing platforms in the world.

The secret wasn’t algorithms.
It was curiosity turned into structure.

We often talk about building with AI like it’s a mechanical process.
But the deeper truth is this: it’s emotional work.

Every successful AI founder I’ve interviewed talks less about “prompt design” and more about personal discipline.
They’re not just optimizing workflows.
They’re optimizing selves.

To build with AI is to practice patience.
To accept imperfection.
To detach from ego.
To be relentlessly curious.

You don’t just build faster — you grow wiser.

And maybe that’s the real “automation” happening here — the automation of excuses.

AI removes every barrier except your willingness to try.

This is the quiet cultural shift almost no one’s talking about.

We’ve moved from a world that valued technical skill to one that rewards intellectual curiosity.

The next generation of builders won’t win because they can code better — but because they can ask better questions.

The founder of the future isn’t an engineer in a hoodie.
It’s a curious mind with a laptop, a few prompts, and the humility to learn publicly.

That’s why I believe the next big tech movement won’t come from Silicon Valley.
It’ll come from individuals everywhere experimenting on their own time, with no permission, no funding, and no fear.

AI leveled the infrastructure.
Curiosity will level the opportunity.

How to turn your ChatGPT ideas into real, usable, and scalable products.

“Don’t ask what AI can do. Ask what annoys you every week.”

Before writing a single prompt, identify a pain point that’s:

Exercise:
Write down three things you or your team waste time on every week.
Next to each, ask: Can this be done faster, clearer, or smarter with AI?

Goal: End this step with one clear problem statement.

Example: “I spend 6 hours a week summarizing client reports.”

“Your first version should look like a hack, not an app.”

Before building software, build a loop.
A loop is the smallest version of your idea that delivers value and collects feedback.

Your Prompt Loop Has 4 Parts:

Example:
→ Input: Paste an article
→ Processing: GPT summarizes into key insights
→ Output: 5-bullet summary
→ Feedback: “Was this useful? Y/N”

Goal: End this step with a working prompt that creates some measurable value.

“The hardest part isn’t making AI work. It’s making people use it twice.”

When you move from prompt → product, design for behavior, not just function.

Checklist:

Example:
Notion AI didn’t make people learn a new workflow — it added AI inside what users were already doing (writing).

Goal: End this step with a simple user flow that feels invisible — friction-free.

“Private validation kills good ideas. Public feedback builds them.”

Share your MVP early — even if it feels incomplete.

How to Launch Small:

Example:
Tweet Hunter began as a shared prompt list. Public interest turned it into a SaaS product.

Goal: 5+ real users giving feedback. Not friends — strangers.

“If it feels too early to charge — that’s the perfect time.”

The difference between a hobby and a product is transaction.

Pricing Framework:

Your first few customers are your real investors.

Goal: Validate that someone will pay to save time or effort.

“Don’t scale chaos. Scale clarity.”

Once you have consistent users and feedback, build structure around your loop.

Systemization Framework:

Pro tip: Document your loops — every refinement becomes training data later.

Goal: A self-running feedback system that improves without manual tracking.

“Automation builds scale. Human context builds trust.”

Every great AI business still has human DNA.

Decide where your human layer lives:

Example: Copy.ai had humans manually review early outputs. That data later trained their tone system.

Goal: Keep one step human — especially early. It’s your secret quality control.

“People buy stories of transformation, not tools.”

Once your product works, give it a narrative.
Explain it like you’d explain a friend’s problem solved.

Example:
Jasper didn’t say “GPT-3 content generator.”
They said “Write marketing copy 10x faster.”

Your Story Framework:

Goal: A one-sentence pitch that anyone can repeat.

“Every loop you improve is a moat you deepen.”

Once you have users, make the system self-correct.

Feedback Flywheel:

That last step creates loyalty — not because of AI, but because of empathy.

Goal: 1-2 monthly improvement cycles driven by data, not guesswork.

“Your first prompt is your prototype. Your product is your process.”

As your product matures, your advantage moves from prompt quality → process design.

Ways to Evolve:

At this stage, your business isn’t “AI-powered.”
It’s AI-structured.

Goal: Move from individual tool → repeatable system → scalable platform.

Before launching anything, run this test:

If you answer “yes” to at least 4, you’re ready to build publicly.

Every era of technology has a spirit.
The dot-com era was about connection.
The mobile era was about convenience.
The AI era? It’s about conscious creation.

AI is forcing us to confront what it really means to create.
Not to just make things, but to make sense.

Because when anyone can build, the question shifts from:

“What can I make?”
to
“What’s worth making?”

And that’s the most human question of all.

If you take one thing from this edition, let it be this:
You don’t need to chase the next big AI idea.
You just need to chase your curiosity — consistently.

Most people wait to start until they feel ready.
Builders start, and that’s what makes them ready.

So write that prompt.
Share that experiment.
Build something that helps one person today — even if that person is you.

See you next time,
— Naseema

That’s all for now. And, thanks for staying with us. If you have specific feedback, please let us know by leaving a comment or emailing us. We are here to serve you!

Join 130k+ AI and Data enthusiasts by subscribing to our LinkedIn page.

Become a sponsor of our next newsletter and connect with industry leaders and innovators.